
January to May 2025 Edition

Hydrologic Conditions in Washington State, March 2025
By Tom Ring
This article is drawn from several sources, especially the state Water Supply Availability Committee (WSAC) and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Current Drought Status
Officially, the Declaration of Drought Emergency issued in April of 2024 by the Washington Department of Ecology remains in effect until April 15th of this year. At that point, Ecology will either allow the declaration to lapse or decide to renew it in full or in part. That decision will be based on recommendations from WSAC, which meets monthly and includes input from water managers and hydrology and climate specialists across the state. Meetings are open to the public (Department of Ecology - Committees, Boards, and Workgroups).
This article documents conditions in mid-March and explores the chances of recovery to non-drought conditions. Images labeled WSAC March 13 are adapted from the presentations to the March 13th WSAC meeting posted at Presentation Materials (Agenda, Ecology, OWSC, NWRFC, USGS, BOR).
Drought Classification Criteria
In brief, drought in Washington is based on two characteristics:
- Hydrologic threshold — An area is receiving, or is projected to receive, less than seventy-five percent of normal water supply.
- Hardship threshold — Water users and the environment are or are expected to experience undue hardship.
Washington Watershed Characteristics
Watersheds in Washington vary based on their location within the state, the magnitude of demand for instream and out-of-stream uses, and the presence or absence of reservoir storage. Many watersheds are fully dependent on seasonal snowpack accumulation and snowmelt runoff in addition to rainfall. Others rely on a mix of snowpack and reservoir storage. The Yakima basin in particular relies on snowmelt early in the irrigation season and reservoir releases later in the season. Annual water supply is strongly influenced by carry-over storage, which is the amount left in the reservoirs at the end of the previous irrigation season.
Current Conditions
Statewide, precipitation and snowpack have lagged below normal over the fall and winter. According to NRCS, the period from January 6 to February 21 was the driest or 2nd driest on record during that time for most SNOTEL stations in Washington. In most years, this period accounts for a substantial portion of annual precipitation and snowpack accumulation. It is unlikely that areas currently below average precipitation will reach normal levels this water year.
Left and below show two different ways of assessing the likelihood of precipitation reaching long term averages.
Left shows the strong gradient between wet and dry this year. Dark blue indicates areas that have already reached 100% due to winter storms that mostly missed Washington except the eastern portion.
Images on this page from March 13 WSAC meeting Presentation Materials (Agenda, Ecology, OWSC, NWRFC, USGS, BOR).
These two maps (March 13 WSAC) show contributions by storms in late February and early March, but snow water equivalent remains below average to well below average in the northern and central Cascades.


Below: Plots of snow water equivalent for snotel sites representative of northern Cascades, southern Cascades, and the ecologically important Dungeness River in the Olympics. For comparison, the plots include the snowpack drought year of 2015 and the very wet 1997. Adapted from NWCC iMap.

Right: 120-day runoff forecast shows ranges from well below average in the north to above average in the south. From March 13 WSAC.
Key observations from the data:
- A strong gradient exists between wet and dry regions this year
- The eastern portion of Washington received more winter storms than other regions
- Areas below normal precipitation would need significantly more than normal precipitation to recover, which is unlikely
- Despite contributions from storms in late February and early March, snow water equivalent remains below average to well below average in the northern and central Cascades
- The 120-day runoff forecast shows ranges from well below average in the north to above average in the south
Yakima Basin Conditions
Effects of water short years in the Yakima basin are felt unevenly depending on water right priority date and whether storage is physically available:
- Tributary users (including instream flow) are dependent on snowmelt runoff and are curtailed on each tributary in reverse order of priority dates. For example, in the Teanaway River in 2015, irrigators were sequentially curtailed until only the Yakama Nation's Time Immemorial instream flow rights remained in the river.
- Mainstem Yakima River users are physically able to access water stored in the Bureau of Reclamation Yakima Project reservoirs and rely on a mix of natural runoff and storage for irrigation. Due to the historical development of irrigation in the Yakima basin:
-
- Those with priority dates before May 10th, 1905, receive a full supply
- May 10th, 1905, rights created by Reclamation receive a pro rata share of what remains
- Anytime the proratables have less than 100% supply, all post-May 10th, 1905, surface right holders are cut off per court order
- The Yakama Nation's instream flow rights are the most senior, but target instream flows are reduced on a sliding scale per 1994 federal legislation
The WSAC March meeting took particular interest in conditions in the Yakima basin. Reclamation delivers in excess of two million acre-feet of irrigation water and has 1.1 million acre-feet of storage. Each year, full supply depends on snowmelt to supply early season demands and reservoir releases in mid to late summer.
Current reservoir storage in the Yakima basin is the third lowest in the period of record, following only 1994 (the third year of a three-year drought) and 1987. According to Reclamation, there is no possibility that the three upper basin reservoirs will fill this year (Keechelus, Kachess, and Cle Elum), while in the Naches Arm, Rimrock has a possibility of filling and the comparatively small Bumping Reservoir is expected to fill. 2024 was the second straight drought year, and as a result, end of season (carryover) storage was extremely low. From March 13 WSAC.
The bottom line for Yakima Project irrigators is:
- Proratable users will receive 48% of supply if runoff estimates hold, with a range from a low of 20% to a high of 78%
- Pre-1905 users will receive full supply
- Instream flow in the lower Yakima River will be set at the minimum of 300 cfs
From March 13 WSAC.
Summary
- The east slopes of the northern Cascades are projected to be the most water-short area of the state.

- The Okanogan and Methow basins have minimum flow rules, which mandate curtailment of users junior to the rule.
- Low elevation watersheds on the west slope have little snowpack and will likely see low flows.
- Proratable irrigators in the Yakima basin will see reduced supply.
- Ecology will determine by mid-April whether to allow the 2024 drought proclamation to lapse or be extended.
- March 12th snotel data from March 13 WSAC
Meditations on Drought
Washington state has one definition for drought, but in practice, drought can mean very different things. 2001 and 2015 were both considered drought years, but could not have been more different climatically, as shown by February streamflow data (left from March 13 WSAC). Below Adapted from NWCC iMap.
2001 was a classic drought — near record low precipitation accompanied by near record low February streamflow.
In contrast, 2015 tracked near normal precipitation most of the winter and had some record high streamflows. Yakima basin reservoirs filled early.
The similarity was low snowpack both years (left). The difference was temperature. Precipitation was ample in 2015 but fell mostly as rain and ran off over the winter. One popular weather blogger objected to calling it a drought given average precipitation and high runoff. As a result, the term "snowpack drought" became popular. In both cases, proratable irrigators received less than half of full supply.
2015 resembled forecasts for future winters in Washington state. Systems that were designed with the expectation that snowmelt would provide for spring and early summer demands for irrigation and fisheries water are not likely to meet needs. The state's drought definition calls out 75% supply, but as 2015 showed, an overabundance of streamflow in winter doesn't provide much help in August.